By Months: Meelis Kiili

Total Months: 11

Fully Profiled: 11

09.2025

2 Speeches

There is not enough data.
06.2025

1 Speeches

The main adversaries are "skeptics" and critics who question the strategic thinking of the defense forces leadership or oppose the introduction of brutal weaponry. The criticism is intense and politically charged, rejecting the claims that Estonian generals are fighting "the last war."
04.2025

1 Speeches

The main adversary is the "eastern neighbor," who is treated as a real and active external threat attempting to disrupt Estonia's way of life and infrastructure. Criticism is directed at limiting the adversary's capabilities through both domestic and international legislation. There is no criticism of domestic political opponents, but there is indirect criticism regarding the slow pace of legislation.
03.2025

3 Speeches

The criticism targets the previous area of governance, which led to the stripping of key functions from the Commander of the Defence Forces and the establishment of a civilian office in place of the military structure. The criticism is systemic and policy-oriented, highlighting the negative repercussions.
02.2025

1 Speeches

Insufficient data.
12.2024

1 Speeches

There is a complete absence of criticism or opposition. The speaker notes that no amendments were submitted regarding the draft bill, which points to a lack of opposition concerning the matter under discussion. The absence of criticism is more of a procedural observation than a political position.
11.2024

1 Speeches

Insufficient data.
09.2024

1 Speeches

No data available
04.2024

2 Speeches

The criticism is primarily aimed at the officialdom and the top executives of the administrative sector, who are accused of failing to understand the nature of the Kaitseliit (Defence League) and planning financing illogically. The criticism is based on competence and procedure, pointing to the need for socially more mature and more competent leaders.
03.2024

5 Speeches

The criticism is primarily aimed at potential risks and procedural deficiencies, rather than specific political adversaries. The speaker criticizes local government leaders who might misuse educational support measures, and emphasizes the aggressiveness of the eastern neighbor as a security threat. He also notes the "technical flaws and linguistic ambiguities" found in the text of the initiated draft bill.
02.2024

1 Speeches

The confrontation is aimed at Russia's ability to circumvent sanctions, which has been defined as a security threat. The speech contains no criticism of domestic political opponents; instead, it raises a question about the adequacy of the government's foreign policy focus.