Session Profile: Tanel Kiik

The speaker criticizes the government's tax policy, calling it favorable to the wealthy, and claims that low-wage earners are suffering due to the VAT increase. It asks experts whether supporting the wealthy actually injects money into the Estonian economy or if that capital simply flows abroad into investments.

Demonstrates a deep understanding of economic policy and the effects of tax policy. Asks expert questions regarding the impact of tax changes on various income groups and the potential for economic growth. Displays knowledge of the relationship between consumption and investment, as well as the flow of money within the economy.

The speaker employs a combatively critical tone, consistently putting forth sharp questions regarding the government's tax policy and priorities. The rhetoric is emotionally charged, yet grounded in specific figures and facts (for instance, the allocation of 4.2 million euros for specialized social care versus over 100 million euros directed toward the wealthy). The addresses are lengthy and well-structured, incorporating both direct inquiries to experts and broader political evaluations, concluding with a categorical recommendation that the government either change its course or step down.

He actively participated in the discussion concerning inflation and tax policy, posing several questions to the experts. At the end, he delivered a long speech, criticizing the government's absence from the debate and calling for a policy change.

He criticized the government over the failure of its tax and economic policies, accusing it of ignoring experts. He called for the government's resignation or a change in policy.

Participates constructively in the economic policy debate, posing informed, expert questions and offering his/her own perspective. He/She urges the government to heed the advice of experts and implement necessary adjustments, sincerely offering assistance and counsel.

It emphasizes the importance of regional policy and criticizes the trend of becoming a "city-state." It mentions the need to support rural areas and reduce regional inequality.

Strongly criticizes the government's tax policy, labeling it regressive and inequitable. Supports a progressive income tax and the lowering of VAT on food items, and demands that experts be consulted on economic policy matters.

He addressed the impact of inflation and tax policy, criticizing the government's priorities. He supported providing aid to low-income earners and ensuring a fairer distribution of the tax burden.

The speaker is intensely focused on criticizing tax policy, stressing the regressive impact of the government’s decisions and how the wealthy are being prioritized at the expense of low-wage earners. They present concrete alternatives, such as slashing VAT on foodstuffs and implementing a progressive income tax. The speaker sharply criticizes budget priorities, highlighting the stark contrast between the severe underfunding of special welfare (only 4.2 million allocated versus the needed 50 million) and the simultaneous salary hike for Riigikogu members. They clearly position themselves as an opposition representative, demanding that the government either change course or resign.