Session Profile: Tanel Kiik
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
2025-06-18
Political Position
The Prime Minister is criticized for reversing the Reform Party's position on the competition law issue. The question is raised whether the Prime Minister deems himself more competent than Kaja Kallas, and who will be held accountable if the European Commission proceeds with the penalty.
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates knowledge of competition law and the principles of the rule of law by specifically inquiring about the reasons for the Reform Party's change in stance. Further demonstrates an understanding of the issues inherent in an oligopolistic market and the risks associated with a European Commission penalty.
Rhetorical Style
The speaker employs sharply confrontational rhetoric, sequentially posing three precise questions to the Prime Minister and accusing the Reform Party of altering its stance without providing public justification. The rhetoric is logical and fact-based, drawing upon concrete examples (Kaja Kallas, Liisa-Ly Pakosta) and mathematical arguments concerning the parliamentary vote arithmetic. The delivery is formal, yet clearly critical in its focus, utilizing rhetorical techniques designed to cast doubt on the opponent's competence.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
One question regarding the Competition Act. A critical viewpoint concerning the modification of government policy.
Opposition Stance
He criticizes the Prime Minister for changing the Reform Party's position on the competition law issue, asking whether he considers himself more competent than Kaja Kallas. He accuses the government of supporting an oligopolistic market and demands accountability for any potential failures.
Collaboration Style
He inquired about the Competition Act, focusing specifically on obtaining factual clarifications. He also demonstrated a willingness to understand the rationale behind the government’s decisions.
Regional Focus
He/She criticized the government’s amendments to the competition law, arguing that they serve the interests of oligopolistic markets and harm consumers across Estonia.
Economic Views
He criticized the amendments to the competition law, arguing that they undermine fair competition and support oligopolistic markets. He emphasized the need to protect consumer interests and ensure a transparent market situation.
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker is intensely focused on the amendments to the Competition Act, criticizing the government’s decision to back a weaker version of the draft legislation compared to the stronger variant initially supported by Kaja Kallas’s government. They highlight specific market sectors—pharmaceuticals, fuel, and communication services—where they perceive the threat of an oligopolistic market to consumers. Concern is expressed regarding the insufficient transposition of the European Union directive and the continuation of resulting fines, demanding accountability for any potential repercussions.
2 Speeches Analyzed