Agenda Profile: Tanel Kiik
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement (420 AE) "On Declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an Institution Supporting the Military Aggression of the Russian Federation"
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Political Position
It supports the statement condemning the activities of the Moscow Patriarchate, emphasizing the protection of religious freedom. It claims that the statement protects Orthodox believers from Kremlin propaganda and does not contain any aggressive language against believers, but rather condemns crimes committed against people.
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates knowledge of the field of religious freedom and international law by specifically inquiring about the activities of the Moscow Patriarchate during the war. Shows an understanding of the difference between Christian values and political propaganda.
Rhetorical Style
It raises questions about religious freedom, employing an analytical approach. The tone is concerned and defensive.
Activity Patterns
He/She raised questions regarding Orthodox congregations, focusing on the protection of religious freedom. He/She demonstrated interest in the balanced treatment of religious issues.
Opposition Stance
He/She criticized the approach taken by EKRE and Isamaa regarding the issue of Orthodox congregations, accusing them of downplaying the problem. He/She stressed the necessity of protecting religious freedom.
Collaboration Style
It demonstrates a cooperative approach to matters of religious freedom, stressing the necessity of distinguishing religious individuals from political engagement and protecting Orthodox believers.
Regional Focus
The addresses primarily focus on the international dimension, discussing Russia's aggression in Ukraine and the role of the Moscow Patriarchate in that conflict. At the same time, the local dimension is also highlighted—stressing the need to protect Orthodox believers both within the Estonian state and worldwide, including in Russia, from Kremlin propaganda and hostile elements.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
He/She addressed the issues of religious freedom within the context of economic sanctions, stressing the need to protect Orthodox believers from Kremlin propaganda and provide economic support to Ukraine.
Social Issues
He/She inquired about the protection of Orthodox believers, emphasizing the necessity of safeguarding religious freedom. He/She supported a statement that protects believers from Kremlin propaganda.
Legislative Focus
The speakers are focusing on a draft declaration by the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) that would designate the Moscow Patriarchate as an institution supporting Russia's military aggression. The first speaker, who is the co-author and editor of the declaration, advocates for its swift discussion, stressing that the declaration actually serves to protect religious freedom and Christian values. The second speaker critically analyzes the statement issued by the Russian People's Council and questions Patriarch Kirill’s actions during the war.
2 Speeches Analyzed