Agenda Profile: Tanel Kiik
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (588 SE) – second reading
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Political Position
Raises questions regarding gender balance and supports quota rules for the boards of listed companies. It criticizes the male dominance within certain factions and provides specific figures on gender balance.
Topic Expertise
Demonstrated a good knowledge of gender balance statistics, citing precise figures regarding the composition of the political parties (EKRE 8:2, Isamaa 7:1, Social Democrats 5:4).
Rhetorical Style
Employs an analytical approach to gender equality issues, backing up arguments with numerical data. The tone is persuasive and evidence-based.
Activity Patterns
He/She raised several questions regarding gender balance, focusing on the analysis of the parliament's composition. He/She used specific numerical examples in the argument.
Opposition Stance
Criticized EKRE and Isamaa for their gender imbalance, utilizing specific numerical examples. They accused these parties of discriminating against women and holding an outdated mindset.
Collaboration Style
They offered constructive criticism regarding gender balance issues, citing the composition of various factions for comparison. They encouraged other political parties to learn from the Social Democrats' experience in ensuring balanced representation.
Regional Focus
Insufficient data
Economic Views
Insufficient data
Social Issues
Vigorously supports the advancement of gender balance, highlighting specific statistical data regarding the composition of political parties. It criticizes the EKRE and Isamaa factions for their low proportion of women (under 20%).
Legislative Focus
They supported gender balance in the management boards of listed companies, criticizing the dominance of men from EKRE and Isamaa. Specific statistical data regarding the composition of the political parties was also presented.