Agenda Profile: Tanel Kiik
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – first reading
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The inquiry concerns the constitutional amendment bill, requesting an explanation as to why Parliament should vote specifically in favor of this particular proposal, as opposed to the other competing drafts.
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates the ability to analyze constitutional amendment procedures and competing bills. Exhibits an understanding of how to evaluate the advantages of various legal solutions.
Rhetorical Style
It utilizes a questioning approach regarding public health matters, and the tone is constructive and forward-looking.
Activity Patterns
A question about the constitutional amendment bill. A short comparative question concerning the different proposals.
Opposition Stance
The speaker is asking about the competing proposals concerning the constitutional amendment bill. The opposition is being constructive, seeking to understand the merits of the various approaches.
Collaboration Style
Provided constructive criticism regarding the constitutional amendments, emphasizing the need for clear solutions. They called for the finding of compromises.
Regional Focus
The speaker asks about raising the subsistence level, emphasizing the impact of rising prices on low-wage earners and the elderly. They support needs-based assistance aimed at supporting the most vulnerable.
Economic Views
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
He inquired about the constitutional amendments, focusing specifically on issues concerning the role of non-citizens. He supported the defense of democratic values.
Legislative Focus
He posed questions regarding the constitutional amendments, examining the differences between the competing drafts and the rationale for supporting one over the other.