Agenda Profile: Tanel Kiik
A written demand submitted by 23 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Infrastructure, Vladimir Svet.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
Political Position
Strongly supports Ukraine and sharply criticizes the motion of no confidence against the infrastructure minister, viewing it as exploitation aimed at gaining political attention. [The subject] emphasizes the minister's actions in supporting Ukraine, both within the Tallinn city government and at the national level, thereby demonstrating strong solidarity with Ukraine’s struggle for freedom.
Topic Expertise
They demonstrated a strong grasp of Tallinn city politics and the specific measures for supporting Ukraine. They accurately cited their experience both in the city government and at the state level, demonstrating a deep understanding of the mechanisms of cooperation between local government and the state.
Rhetorical Style
He employed an emotional and personal approach, highlighting genuine concern and support. The style was straightforward and defensive, utilizing concrete examples to refute the political accusations.
Activity Patterns
A statement delivered during the debate on the motion of no confidence against the Minister of Infrastructure, focusing on the theme of support for Ukraine and experiences of cooperation within the Tallinn city government. The address was personal and supportive of the minister.
Opposition Stance
The speaker supports the Minister of Infrastructure against the motion of no confidence, criticizing EKRE's actions as exploiting the current political situation. They emphasize the minister's actual deeds in supporting Ukraine and deem the no-confidence motion to be insincere.
Collaboration Style
Offered support to the Minister of Infrastructure on matters concerning aid to Ukraine, emphasizing the need to protect shared values. Demonstrated readiness to support pan-European cooperation.
Regional Focus
The speaker refers to the Tallinn City Government's experience in supporting Ukrainian refugees and providing humanitarian aid. He/She emphasizes the capital city's role in addition to the national support.
Economic Views
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
He/She posed questions to the Minister of Infrastructure regarding support for Ukraine, emphasizing the need to continue providing humanitarian aid and other assistance during the war.
Legislative Focus
The speaker focuses on the procedure for the motion of no confidence against Infrastructure Minister Vladimir Svet, questioning the minister's motivations and political background. The speaker emphasizes the issue of supporting Ukraine and examines how knowledge acquired at the local level (the experience of the City of Tallinn) can be applied at the government level in providing humanitarian aid and supporting refugees.
2 Speeches Analyzed