By Months: Yoko Alender

The style of the first speech is positive, optimistic, and even "exalted," especially given the successful completion of a long process. The speaker uses both a personal anecdote (a 12-year dream) and an official commission presentation, maintaining a formal and relevant tone throughout. The second speech is an extremely brief and resolute expression of opposition.

The speaking style is formal, analytical, and forward-looking, emphasizing optimism as both a duty and a responsibility (a reference to Karl Popper). Old folk wisdom is utilized, and an attempt is made to give it new meaning to support the logical argumentation regarding the necessity of taking concrete legislative steps. The tone is balanced, yet ambitious, while simultaneously stressing the need to remain measured and knowledge-based.

The rhetorical style is formal, data-driven, and convincingly optimistic, highlighting the inevitable economic benefits of the green transition. Strong appeals to core values (freedom, health, security) are employed, and rhetorical questions are posed to underscore the significance of the issue. The speaker clearly separates expertise from denial, leveling accusations of either misunderstanding or outright malice against their opponents.

The rhetorical style is formal and direct, employing a polite form of address ("Esteemed Chair"). The statement itself is brief, focusing on clearly communicating the faction's position without resorting to emotional or logical appeals.