By Plenary Sessions: Ester Karuse

The rhetorical style is direct, questioning, and concerned, utilizing rhetorical questions to cast doubt on the minister's claims. The appeals are grounded in practical logic and operational knowledge, stressing that recruiting staff by reducing the number of police officers leaves the streets vulnerable. The tone is serious, demanding specific figures and projections regarding staffing levels and incentive measures.

The rhetorical style is critical, analytical, and morally charged, frequently employing rhetorical questions concerning government priorities and justice. The speaker balances logical arguments (such as debt burden figures) with emotional appeals, highlighting the lack of solidarity and the excessive burden placed upon working people. Sharp phrases are used, such as "coddling the banks" and "gifts for the rich."

The style is formal and direct, focusing on presenting specific questions to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the minister. Both logical argumentation (statistics) and personal experience, along with external references (businessman Heiti Hääl), are utilized to emphasize the concerns. The tone is demanding and well-informed.