By Plenary Sessions: Ester Karuse

The speech is highly formal, informative, and procedural, focusing on the presentation of facts regarding the committee's work. The tone is neutral and logical, lacking emotional appeals or narratives. The style is that of a rapporteur, who provides an overview of the events that took place and recommends supporting the draft legislation.

The rhetorical style is critical and questioning, posing direct questions to the presenter regarding the shortcomings of the process. The speaker uses a specific narrative (the Valga case) to illustrate the procedural flaws, citing emotionally charged messages from parents ("human experiments are forbidden in school").

The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and strictly factual, focusing on the objective presentation of the proceedings and the decisions made by the Foreign Affairs Committee. Emotional or persuasive appeals are absent; the discourse is straightforward and concentrates solely on procedural details.

The style is formal and respectful, addressing the esteemed rapporteur and the Speaker of the Riigikogu, but simultaneously worried and demanding. An emotional appeal is utilized, describing the disappearance of bank branches as "a morally very significant blow to the residents of the region." The speaker poses direct, solution-oriented questions, favoring logical argumentation.