Session Profile: Ester Karuse
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
2024-12-16
Political Position
The political position is highly critical of the government’s actions, focusing specifically on procedural legitimacy and execution. The most significant issue is the violation of the principles of sound law-making, which is directly linked to the decline in public trust in the government (a worrying 37%). There is a demand for the restoration of the government’s credibility and transparency.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in legislative procedures, utilizing technical terms such as the "Intention to Develop Legislation" and the "principles of good law-making." The analysis focuses on procedural shortcomings and their direct link to the government's trustworthiness, also referencing a specific trust rating (37%).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, expressing a tone of concern regarding the government's actions. The speaker relies on logical arguments and refers to survey data, focusing on using the question to demand solutions from the minister.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active during the plenary session, repeatedly addressing questions to the minister concerning the government's review and the quality of lawmaking. A second address reveals a pattern where the speaker affirms the proper timing and relevance of the question being posed.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Criticism is aimed at the government, alleging procedural violations in the adherence to the principles of good legislative practice. The opposition is strong and centers on the government’s deficits in credibility and transparency.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on enhancing the quality and transparency of the law-making process. The priority is the rigorous adherence to the principles of good law-making, including the preparation of legislative intentions and the adequate involvement of stakeholders, even in the case of time-critical initiatives.
2 Speeches Analyzed