By Plenary Sessions: Jaanus Karilaid

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of macroeconomics and fiscal policy, using specific figures (500 million annually, 2 billion over four years) when assessing the impact of the tax hump. The views of economic experts and entrepreneurs are highlighted, and Lithuania's economic growth is cited for comparison, warning against following Estonia's example.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in economic policy, focusing specifically on industrial development, taxation, and recession management. In his arguments, he draws upon both the assessments of Lithuanian economic experts and research published in the Riigikogu Proceedings concerning the necessity of industry.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in constitutional law, the legislative process, and issues concerning legal certainty. He uses technical terms such as constitutional review, references Supreme Court rulings, and analyzes the capacity deficiencies of the Parliamentary Chancellery. He emphasizes the importance of competence within the ministries and the Riigikogu (Parliament) apparatus.