By Plenary Sessions: Jaanus Karilaid

The style is predominantly analytical and procedural, given that this is a commission report, but it also includes sharp criticism directed at the government. Logical arguments are employed, highlighting the necessity of the draft bill and the government's peculiar behavior concerning the security report. The introduction features an acknowledgment of a political competitor (Ando), which suggests a certain degree of conciliatory tone.

The rhetorical style is combative, direct, and critical, accusing the Prime Minister of avoiding topics and possessing an "astonishing ability to reinvent herself." The argumentation relies on data and logical appeals (the audit results), but simultaneously employs sharp language to call the Prime Minister's credibility into question ("Surely the Prime Minister cannot just be throwing words around").