By Plenary Sessions: Jaanus Karilaid

The tone is extremely confrontational, accusatory, and sharply critical, employing strong characterizations such as "somewhat hollow," "hypocritical," and "a security threat to Estonia." The appeals are primarily emotional and politically charged, stressing the opponents' incompetence and inability to read society. The speech is direct and formally characteristic of a parliamentary address.

The rhetorical style is sharp, critical, and demanding, emphasizing the urgency of addressing both inaction and broken promises. Figurative expressions are employed, such as "passing the hot potato," to describe how government agencies shirk responsibility. The speaker uses rhetorical questions and appeals to national principles, setting them in stark contrast to the government's convenience.