By Plenary Sessions: Jaanus Karilaid

The style is initially critical of the political culture (criticizing the practice of finger-pointing), but subsequently shifts to an analytical tone, emphasizing the recurring gap between election promises and reality. Finally, the style becomes highly constructive and pragmatic, making a public proposal to the minister for specific cooperation and the organization of a visit. The speaker also acknowledges the higher political style (Mr. Kivimägi, Chairman of the Session).

The rhetorical style is critical and urgent, employing strong assessments to describe the government's policy ("indifferent, fragmented, and chaotic"). A logical appeal is utilized, directly connecting the energy deficit with the absence of economic prosperity. The speech aims to raise substantive questions and demand solutions so that political slogans do not remain hollow.