By Plenary Sessions: Jaanus Karilaid

The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, directed at a member of the Government of the Republic during a session of the Riigikogu. It employs references to "confusion" and "rebirth" concerning the stated positions, which lends the tone a subtle critical undertone while simultaneously demanding legally precise argumentation.

The rhetorical style is highly combative, accusatory, and critical, employing strong emotional language such as "partisan arrogance" and "stifling the economy." Irony is utilized, particularly in connecting family benefits to the car tax, and there are references to the internal disagreements within the Reform Party. The discourse is formal but includes sharp descriptions concerning the government members' inability to self-critique.

The rhetorical style is direct, critical, and demanding, focusing on the shortcomings and incompetence evident in the prime ministerial candidate's opening address. Rhetorical questions and emotional appeals (e.g., injustice) are employed to underscore the lack of accountability and the gravity of the issues. The tone is formal, yet sharply confrontational in its substance.