By Plenary Sessions: Jaanus Karilaid

The rhetoric is combative and accusatory, centered on exposing the government's failures and highlighting its hypocrisy. Strong emotional appeals are employed, referencing the prime minister's displeasure and the public's "whining about poverty." The speaker backs up their criticism with specific quotes and alleged inside information.

The rhetorical style is highly aggressive and critical, accusing the government of failure, dishonesty, and a lack of proper analysis. Direct speech and strong phrases are employed ("you're playing dumb," "you had to lie to the people"), and challenges are posed to the minister's self-confidence. The appeal itself is a blend of logical argumentation concerning economic indicators and emotional accusations regarding dishonesty.

The rhetorical style is formal and procedural, concentrating on justifying both the substance of the inquiry and the rationale for its current relevance. The tone is analytical, emphasizing the shift in facts (original knowledge versus current knowledge) with the goal of obtaining specific answers from the minister. The speech is brief and straightforward.