By Plenary Sessions: Jaanus Karilaid

The rhetorical style is analytical and inquiry-focused, aiming to highlight the contradictions and negative impact of the policy. The tone is formal and respectful (when addressing the Chair and the presenter), employing logical appeals that focus on the justifications for the tax and the details of the budget.

The rhetorical style is highly combative, critical, and urgent, highlighting the extensive shortcomings and confusion surrounding the government's actions. Strong negative phrases are employed ("total crisis," "political dogma," "cacophonous tax hike"), and the appeal relies on logic and facts (lack of competence, specific financial figures). The tone is formal, yet sharp.

The rhetorical style is sharp, demanding, and critical, characterizing the minister's activities as "just hot air" and "empty rhetoric." The speaker contrasts this rhetorical posturing with real steps and decisions, demanding concrete answers regarding the actions taken over the last month or two. The tone is impatient and emphasizes the urgent need to act immediately.