By Plenary Sessions: Jaanus Karilaid

The rhetorical style is sharp, critical, and at times emotional, employing strong expressions such as "strikingly different" and accusing the government of lying. The speaker balances procedural criticism (impact assessments, the coordination instrument) with moral accusations regarding the decline of political culture. He uses a rhetorical question (why comments are made instead of simply refusing coordination) and requests additional time, which underscores the importance of the topic to him.