Session Profile: Jaanus Karilaid
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
2024-03-20
Political Position
The political stance is strongly supportive of establishing the War of Independence monument on Hiiumaa, emphasizing both its historical significance and regional necessity. The focus centers on results-based criticism, as the project remains unexecuted despite secured funding and a ready building permit obtained by previous governments (Ratas, Lukas). This position demands explanations and accountability regarding the reasons for the project's delay.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates detailed knowledge of the chronology and administrative process of the specific monument project, relying on information provided by local citizens. Specific details are presented, such as the year the commission was formed (2016), the name of the design competition winner (Sander Paljak), the existence of the building permit, and the allocated sum (250,000 euros).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal, procedural, and fact-based, utilizing a chronological narrative to present the issue. The tone is inquisitive and demanding, focusing on a logical structure that emphasizes that all prerequisites for the project's completion have been met, yet the result is missing. The ultimate goal is to obtain explanations and justifications from the minister.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Demonstrates activity during the Riigikogu Q&A session by posing a specific question to the minister. The speaker has been gathering background information from local citizens (Anti and Peep), which indicates direct communication with constituents.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The confrontation is directed against the inaction of the current government or the responsible minister, given that the funded and prepared project has not been completed. The criticism is procedural and outcome-based, clearly asking why the memorial is not yet finished.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker is collaborating with local citizens (Anti and Peep) to gather detailed and timely information. There is a positive reference to the successful efforts of previous administrations (Jüri Ratas, Tõnis Lukas) in securing regional support, which indicates recognition of past political cooperation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is a very strong regional focus on Hiiumaa, highlighting the fact that it is the only county lacking a memorial for the War of Independence. Attention is drawn to the obstacles preventing the realization of a specific regional historical project.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic focus is restricted to a grant for targeted regional investment (€250,000) intended for the creation of historical and cultural infrastructure. It is emphasized that the funding is available, but it has not been utilized.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The central social theme is historical memory and national identity, emphasizing the significance of the War of Independence monument and the need to establish it on Hiiumaa. This is presented as an unfulfilled historical obligation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on overseeing the executive power and demanding accountability regarding the delay in implementing the existing project. This is centered on oversight rather than the initiation of new legislation.
1 Speeches Analyzed