By Plenary Sessions: Madis Kallas

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and purely interrogative ("esteemed chairman," "dear presenter"). The discourse focuses on the logical need for information, posing a structured question concerning political criteria.

The rhetorical style is formal, persuasive, and explanatory, focusing on elucidating the objectives and details of the legislative amendment. Logical appeals and examples (e.g., the analogy of speed limits) are employed to dispel doubts. The speaker repeatedly emphasizes the principle of trust and proximity, concluding with a call to trust local authorities.

The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, repeatedly employing the salutations "Esteemed Chairman" and "Esteemed Rapporteur." The speaker poses questions in an analytical tone, focusing on procedural and legislative bottlenecks that impede speed. The appeal is logical and relies on feedback from entrepreneurs.

The rhetorical style is polite and formal, addressing both the Chairman and the Minister deferentially. The speaker employs a constructive approach, confirming the success of one process, but then presenting clarifying and politically detailed questions regarding other similar cases.

The style is formal, analytical, and data-driven, relying on the analysis of the Ministry of Finance's report. The tone is critical, yet constructive, acknowledging positive developments (e.g., the effective use of EU funds) while simultaneously offering fair criticism. It uses technical terms such as "consolidation" and "breaking down silos."