Agenda Profile: Madis Kallas
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – second reading
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The political focus is on amending the constitution to prohibit citizens of aggressor states from voting in local elections. The Social Democrats strongly support this position, emphasizing a values-based framework where the participation of Putin supporters in elections is unacceptable. They advocate for swift action so that the amendment can take effect in time for this autumn's local elections. This stance is motivated by security values and the continuation of the war in Ukraine.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the procedures for amending the constitution and the long-running debate surrounding voting rights, noting that the topic has been discussed for years. They refer to the dangers and bottlenecks highlighted by esteemed legal experts and individuals involved in the drafting of the constitution, thereby acknowledging the legal complexity of the issue.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and serious, emphasizing both the need for thorough discussions and swift action. The speaker employs strong value-based and emotional appeals, stressing that "a person who voted for Putin yesterday must not be allowed to elect the council in our cities and municipalities tomorrow." The tone is persuasive and underscores both personal and factional conviction.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is addressing the Riigikogu on behalf of the parliamentary group during the second reading of the bill, signaling active involvement in the legislative process. He/She references prior substantive debates held within the faction, as well as repeated public statements made by the party.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Direct political opponents are not criticized, but the speaker preemptively addresses possible accusations of rushing the constitutional amendment or adopting an oversimplified approach. It is also acknowledged that legal experts have highlighted the dangers and shortcomings of the change, but the faction is prepared to move forward regardless.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker stressed the need for broad cooperation, pointing out that the draft legislation was initiated by 61 Riigikogu members, including the majority of the Social Democrats. He/She acknowledged that compromises were necessary, both within the political parties themselves and on the floor of the chamber, to reach wide-ranging consensus.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is at the national level (specifically, amending the constitution), but it directly impacts local governments and municipal council elections in Estonia. This issue is closely tied to the context of international security and the war in Ukraine.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The main social issue is the restriction of voting rights for citizens of aggressor states in local elections. This is being addressed from the perspective of security and democratic acceptability, emphasizing that Putin's supporters should not be allowed to elect local councils in Estonia.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative priority is the adoption of the draft act amending the Constitution (Bill 536 SE), to prevent citizens of aggressor states from participating in local elections. The speaker is a strong proponent of this initiative and wishes for its rapid entry into force, ideally in time for the local elections taking place this autumn.
1 Speeches Analyzed