By Years: Raimond Kaljulaid

The speaker’s style in parliament is formal, yet often sharp and combative, especially when criticizing the government’s actions (for example, demanding a “red card” for a minister). They frequently employ rhetorical questions and historical parallels (such as 1990s foreign policy or the Nordic experience with immigration). The tone is predominantly urgent and demanding, balancing factual arguments (data, legal statutes) with emotional appeals (trust, safety, social justice).

The speaker's style is often confrontational, sharp, and insistent, especially when interacting with opponents, utilizing strong expressions such as "complete farce," "populism," and "ranting troll." He balances logical arguments (data regarding the fulfillment of the NATO 2% target) with emotional and personal attacks (references to the residence permit business and the repetition of Kremlin narratives). He emphasizes the necessity of respecting parliament and criticizes the session chairman's failure to maintain order.