Session Profile: Raimond Kaljulaid
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2025-10-06
Political Position
The political position is highly critical of the government's actions concerning Estonia's reputation on the international stage, particularly regarding the plan to transfer Nordic criminals to Estonia. Criticism is also directed at the shifting of responsibility in educational matters, and demands are being made for greater transparency of the state budget draft for the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). The primary focus is on the quality of the government's performance and value-based image building.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates proficiency in assessing international reputation and foreign policy influence, drawing comparisons to the cooperation between the USA and El Salvador. Furthermore, the presentation includes knowledge regarding the structural organization of education (specifically, the division of responsibilities between the state and local municipalities) and the procedural transparency of the national budget.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical, sharp, and employs irony, comparing the exchange to a "Tujurikkuja" sketch. Simplifying analogies are used (e.g., the Swedbank client), and the perspective of an Estonian parent is highlighted to underscore the lack of accountability. Questions are directed straight to the minister, demanding clear answers regarding reputational damage and budget transparency.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active in the plenary sessions of the Riigikogu, posing questions to ministers on three different topics during a single session day. He/She highlights the long working hours and unhealthy environment within the Riigikogu, which clearly indicates intensive participation in the sessions.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main confrontation is with the government and its ministers, who are being criticized for shifting responsibility, poor public image, and insufficient budget transparency. The criticism is directed at the quality of the government's actions and procedural shortcomings, rather than being personal.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national topics (the reputation of the Republic of Estonia, the Estonian parent) and international issues (cooperation with the Nordic countries, comparisons with the USA and El Salvador). There is a lack of specific attention paid to local or regional Estonian problems.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic analyses strongly emphasize the need to improve the transparency and clarity of the state budget for members of the Riigikogu. The current presentation of the budget bill is considered inadequate and confusing.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
In the social sphere, the focus is on the organization of education, criticizing the way responsibility is being shuffled between the state and local municipalities, a situation that is failing to satisfy parents. International criminal law is also addressed in relation to the plan to house foreign criminals in Estonia, highlighting the negative impact this would have on the country's reputation.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is directed towards government oversight and procedural improvements, requiring better presentation and analysis of the draft budget. Furthermore, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is prioritizing the assessment of the impact of government undertakings (for example, the placement of prisoners) on Estonia’s reputation.
3 Speeches Analyzed