Agenda Profile: Raimond Kaljulaid

Third Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Traffic Act and the Police and Border Guard Act (429 SE)

2024-06-12

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

Political Position
The political position is strongly value-based, focusing on supporting balanced traffic management that ensures the safety and convenience of all road users (pedestrians, micro-mobility users, drivers). The speaker emphasizes that legislation must keep pace with rapid technological development (e-commerce, autonomous solutions) and strongly supports measures to ensure the safety of cycling enthusiasts. He criticizes the polarization of road users and business models that rely on breaking the law.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding amendments to the Traffic Act, detailing issues related to micro-mobility devices, the rapid growth of e-commerce, and the subsequent parking challenges. He/She highlights specific solutions, such as the mandatory 1.5-meter lateral passing distance when overtaking a cyclist, and directly links the need for legislation to the evolution of traffic culture and technological advancement.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style of the speech is constructive and analytical, focusing on core political principles (balanced safety and comfort). The introduction features a personal and positive address to a colleague, congratulating them on their outstanding election result, which establishes a cooperative tone. The delivery is formal and logic-driven, deliberately avoiding emotional appeals.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speech was delivered during the third reading of the bill, for which an additional three minutes were requested. The speaker referenced the recently concluded European Parliament elections and the participation of Riigikogu members in those elections, demonstrating awareness of current political events.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker implicitly criticizes the polarization among road users, deeming it regrettable. He/She directs strong criticism toward companies whose business models are founded on violating traffic laws or jeopardizing others, specifically targeting deficiencies within the business culture itself.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker demonstrated a strong commitment to cooperation by publicly congratulating the Deputy Chairman on his outstanding election result. He/She stressed the Social Democratic Party’s support for traffic management that considers all stakeholders, indicating a desire to achieve a broad-based and balanced solution.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is primarily on national legislation (the Riigikogu chamber) and nationwide social trends in Estonia, such as the practice of road cycling. Local governments are also mentioned as partners in supporting traffic management.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker acknowledges the rapid growth of e-commerce and its impact on transportation, which has led to parking problems. He supports regulations and oversight to prevent a situation where businesses operate by breaking the law, emphasizing the need for a law-abiding business culture.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The primary social issue revolves around the safety and comfort of all road users, stressing the need to take into account vulnerable groups, such as children and the elderly, who often travel on foot or use public transportation. It is emphasized that pitting different road users against one another is regrettable, as most people utilize various modes of transport.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is supporting the draft amendment (429 SE) to the Traffic Act and the Police and Border Guard Act in order to modernize the legislation. Priorities include regulating micromobility devices, resolving issues stemming from courier services, and ensuring cyclist safety through a mandatory 1.5-meter lateral passing distance. The speaker supports the repeated modernization of the law due to technological advancements.

2 Speeches Analyzed