By Plenary Sessions: Mario Kadastik

The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on the accurate conveyance of the economic commission's discussions and decisions. The speaker employs logical reporting, avoiding emotional appeals and concentrating instead on facts and procedural details (e.g., voting results: 7 votes in favor, 2 against).

The style is highly formal, procedural, and analytical, focusing on a factual summary of the Economic Commission's discussions and consensus decisions. It employs logical appeals, explaining, for instance, the avoidance of duplicating language requirements and the low cost of IT solutions, while strictly avoiding emotional expressions.

Insufficient data

The style is highly formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on the detailed and chronological reporting of the Economic Committee's sessions. Logical and fact-based arguments are employed, emphasizing dates, decisions, and the substance of the questions and answers. Slight irony or an allusion is discernible at the beginning of the discourse (a reference to the "Reform Party question").