Agenda Profile: Mario Kadastik

Debate on the nationally significant issue "The Drawbacks of Wind Power," initiated by the faction of the Estonian Conservative People's Party.

2025-04-24

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Political Position
The political stance is firmly focused on supporting the energy transition, stressing the importance of energy security and opposing any cooperation with Russia. The speaker sharply criticizes the continued use of oil shale energy due to its high cost, citing an additional expense of 15 billion euros over a 15-year period. The position is heavily fact-based and policy-centric, concentrating on correcting the opposing side's data.

8 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates a high level of technical expertise in the fields of energy, physics, and environmental impacts. Specific terms and data are used, such as acoustic pressures, 0.2 millipascals, infrasound, grid generating inverters, and the capacity of the Paldiski pumped hydro storage. He/She corrects the figures presented by the opposing side regarding the capacity of batteries, electric vehicles, and Finnish nuclear power plants.

8 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is sharply analytical, critical, and at times combative, particularly concerning the quality of facts and experts presented by the opposing side. The arguments are predominantly logical and data-driven, seeking to scientifically refute specific claims (e.g., the effect of infrasound on health). Ultimately, the overall low quality and inadequate substance of the debate are criticized.

8 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively participating in the Riigikogu's discussion of a national matter of significant importance, repeatedly posing questions and concluding with a long summarizing address. He/She refers to earlier discussions held in the Economic Affairs Committee (regarding the environmental impact bill) and a recent debate with Urmas.

8 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition (EKRE) is under heavy criticism because the debate they initiated was severely lacking, factually incorrect, and utilized misleading data (e.g., the map of bird restrictions). The opposition is especially sharply criticized for its "tremendous affinity for Russia," including lamenting the departure from the BRELL system and expressing a desire to use Russian nuclear technology, all while calling Russia a terrorist state.

8 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker emphasizes the need to hold high-quality, objective, and transparent debates, inviting experts who truly know their subject matter. He/She refers to collaboration with an external expert (ornithologist and researcher Marko Mägi) for fact-checking regarding the bird restriction maps.

8 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national energy policy and security, referencing specific Estonian projects like the Paldiski pumped-storage facility and the Kiisa power plant. International elements are also covered (the BRELL system, the Finnish nuclear power plant).

8 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker supports market-based solutions and competition, noting that battery builders want to enter the market, not keep the price high. He/She is strongly opposed to the high price of oil shale and demands an objective calculation of the actual costs of oil shale.

8 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker addresses, among the social issues, the alleged health impact of wind farms (infrasound and acoustic pressures). He refutes these claims, explaining based on physical data (0.2 millipascals), that the supposed mechanical effect on the organism is absurd and is likely a manifestation of the nocebo effect.

8 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on participating in and substantively contributing to the discussion of an issue of national importance, serving as a critical opponent to the topic initiated by the opposing side. He refers to previous work in the Economic Committee during the review of the draft bill on environmental impacts.

8 Speeches Analyzed