By Months: Maria Jufereva-Skuratovski

Total Months: 15

Fully Profiled: 15

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
09.2025

2 Speeches

The speaker criticizes the previous state of affairs, where the police were forced to operate under vague rules that failed to meet constitutional requirements. He indirectly addresses opponents concerned about the restriction of individual rights, dismissing their arguments by stressing that the effect of the cameras is strictly limited and cannot be compared to the suffering endured by a victim of crime.
Details View Details
06.2025

4 Speeches

There is no direct criticism of opponents; the criticism is instead aimed at earlier uncertainty and the slow decision-making process. The speaker emphasizes that the new rules must be clear and they must not change every four years, hinting at previous instability.
Details View Details
05.2025

5 Speeches

The text lacks direct attacks or criticism aimed at specific opponents or political groups. The criticism focuses instead on the clarity of the policy and risk assessment, rather than individuals or political antagonisms.
Details View Details
04.2025

3 Speeches

Criticism is directed at the shortcomings in implementing the government's policy (the car tax) and ensuring the security of e-elections. In terms of foreign policy, Russia has been clearly identified as the adversary, which is accused of waging a well-planned and centrally managed information war. It also seeks clarification regarding the Center Party's position on completely abandoning e-elections.
Details View Details
03.2025

1 Speeches

The opposition is aimed more at the procedure and the lack of clarity regarding roles, rather than at a specific individual, questioning why Parliament needs to submit a proposal to the government. The criticism is procedural and of moderate intensity, seeking clarification on Parliament's actual role.
Details View Details
02.2025

9 Speeches

The primary criticism is aimed at the Centre Party concerning the bank tax bill, which has been labeled populist, superficial, and drafted without serious analysis. Furthermore, the speaker disputed Riina Solman's claim regarding the flags in Lasnamäe, as well as Henn Põlluaas's assertions concerning the reliability of citizens of Russian nationality.
Details View Details
12.2024

1 Speeches

The main objection is directed at the initiators of the specific bill, who are being criticized for their populist approach. The opposition is intense and focuses on the substantive ineffectiveness of the draft legislation, rather than constituting a personal attack.
Details View Details
11.2024

1 Speeches

Opponents are defined as those who oppose the draft law, and they are being sharply criticized for their use of manipulative rhetoric. The criticism is aimed specifically at the opponents' communication methods, rather than their political stances themselves. The speaker views persuading these opponents as a difficult, perhaps even a lost, cause.
Details View Details
10.2024

1 Speeches

The speaker notes that his previous presentation of the topic drew sharp criticism, but in this current speech, specific adversaries or opposition groups will not be criticized or identified. Instead, the criticism is aimed at the inefficiency of the existing system in boosting the birth rate.
Details View Details
09.2024

3 Speeches

There is no opposition, nor is any criticism being voiced. The speaker stresses that not a single proposal concerning the draft bill was submitted by the deadline for amendments. He also notes that the Foreign Affairs Committee made its procedural decisions by consensus, which points to a lack of opposition.
Details View Details
06.2024

3 Speeches

Insufficient information.
Details View Details
05.2024

3 Speeches

There is no direct confrontation, as the addresses are presented in the form of questions directed at the ministers. The questions indirectly point to the need to improve government oversight and policy implementation, particularly concerning childcare conditions and the consumption of sugary drinks.
Details View Details
03.2024

1 Speeches

There is no criticism; instead, questions are being posed to the Minister of Health concerning action plans and data. Specific opponents or groups being criticized are not named.
Details View Details
02.2024

5 Speeches

The primary adversary is the Russian Federation, which is described as an aggressor attempting to destroy the world order and impose the rules of brutal force. Criticism is also directed at Russia's massive propaganda, which is freely available in Europe and the USA. Additionally, emphasis is placed on the necessity of engaging with people living in Estonia who support Kremlin-aligned narratives.
Details View Details
01.2024

2 Speeches

The criticism is aimed at the EKRE faction's activities, questioning their choice to deal exclusively with the Bronze Soldier monument and not with other objects. The opposition is a matter of procedure and setting priorities, not a personal one.
Details View Details
Back to Profiling