By Plenary Sessions: Aleksei Jevgrafov

The rhetorical style is formal, yet urgent and demanding, highlighting the seriousness of the situation and the impact of the evolving security landscape. The appeal relies primarily on logic and data, utilizing statistics (such as the scale of the staffing shortfall and the increase in offenses) to substantiate the criticism. In the second address, direct dissatisfaction is voiced regarding the minister's failure to provide a response.

The style is formal, analytical, and inquisitive, addressing the Chairman of the Riigikogu and the submitter of the draft bill directly. The speaker employs logical argumentation, focusing on procedural feasibility, and concludes with a constructive question concerning the involvement of experts.

The style is formal and question-driven, addressing the chair of the session and colleagues. S1 employs challenging and logical argumentation, calling into question the competence and assertions of the Minister of Finance, labeling them unusual and false. S2 is more neutral and seeks a specific expert opinion regarding the social impacts.