By Plenary Sessions: Aleksei Jevgrafov

The style is formal and analytical, relying on statistics and logical cause-and-effect arguments. Although critical of government policy (taxation, funding cuts), it maintains a parliamentary tone. On one matter, it even expresses agreement with the minister that joint efforts are necessary to achieve success.

The style is formal and analytical, beginning with a polite expression of gratitude to the Minister for the substantive presentation. In justifying their stance, the speaker relies on a specific sad truth derived from statistics and a logical explanation concerning the causes of obesity. Simultaneously, the presentation includes sharp and convinced criticism of the government's tax proposal.

The rhetoric is formal and direct, addressing the minister respectfully. The style is purely interrogative, focusing on facts and the details of policy implementation, without emotional or polemical appeals.

The style is formal and critical, addressing the session chairman and the prime minister respectfully. Logical argumentation is employed, emphasizing that raising taxes cannot help establish a sense of security. The speaker uses emotional emphasis (women's fear of getting pregnant) to highlight the severity of the economic situation.

The rhetorical style is polite and formal, utilizing salutations such as "Honorable Minister" and "Esteemed Chairman." The tone is inquisitive and solution-oriented, seeking clarity on policy details and offering cooperation ("how may we be of assistance to you?").

The rhetorical style is formal, yet sharp and confrontational. The speaker uses direct questions to call the minister's motives into question (whether it was a misunderstanding or a deliberate signal), accusing him of distorting Narva's position before the entire Estonian nation. The emphasis is placed on fact-based logic to defend the specific nature of Narva's application.