Session Profile: Aleksei Jevgrafov
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2025-11-06
Political Position
The speaker focuses on income inequality and relative poverty, particularly in Ida-Viru County, demanding concrete measures from the government. Strong skepticism is also expressed regarding the reliability and security of e-elections, highlighting the inadequacy of existing control mechanisms. The political framework is viewed as being rather outcome-oriented, leading to criticism of the ineffectiveness of current strategies (Estonia 2035) in addressing social problems.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding socio-economic data, referencing recent figures from Statistics Estonia and a specific leading analyst (Epp Remmelg). They are familiar with the objectives of the development strategy "Eesti 2035" and are capable of linking statistical indicators (relative poverty at 33%) with regional issues. Furthermore, they are aware of problems concerning e-voting security and control mechanisms, mentioning the difficulties the police face in finding evidence.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and critical, relying on official data and institutional testimonies to substantiate claims. Direct questions are employed, demanding specific answers concerning strategies and measures. A slightly more intense tone is adopted when discussing e-elections, asserting that their insecurity is "clear to everyone."
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Based on the data, active participation in the plenary session is evident, with questions being submitted to both the minister and the rapporteur on the same day. This indicates regular engagement with agenda items and continuous scrutiny of the government's activities.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Criticism is aimed at the inadequacy of the government's economic measures and the development strategy "Eesti 2035" when it comes to reducing income inequality. There is strong opposition to e-voting, which is viewed as insecure and uncontrollable, further highlighting the police's inability to monitor or regulate the process. The criticism is directed at policies and procedures, not at individuals.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
A strong regional focus is placed on Ida-Virumaa, which is highlighted as the region where the proportion of people living in relative poverty is the highest in the country (33%). Specific actions and investments aimed precisely at this area are called for to mitigate the risk of poverty.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives center on reducing income inequality and mitigating poverty risk, identifying a systemic problem in the current situation. Support is given to targeted government investments and specific measures designed to improve socio-economic conditions in the most vulnerable regions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The primary social issue is relative poverty and income inequality, which is tackled using official statistical data. There is an emphasis on the need to address social stratification, a problem that is particularly acute in Ida-Viru County.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on auditing the effectiveness of existing government development strategies (Estonia 2035) and economic measures. The second priority is raising questions regarding the security and reliability of e-elections at the Riigikogu (Parliament) level, demanding the verifiability of democratic processes.
2 Speeches Analyzed