Agenda Profile: Aleksei Jevgrafov
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Justice and Digital Minister Liisa-Ly Pakostale, submitted by 42 members of the Riigikogu.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political position focuses on evaluating the minister's performance and identifying areas for development, while also emphasizing specific operational crises, such as the situation on the Narva border. The approach is rather results-based, seeking self-analysis and future plans from the minister. The speaker acknowledges the widespread criticism but partially positions themselves separately from it, preferring instead to inquire about fixing specific shortcomings.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker expresses interest in administrative governance (specifically its weaknesses and development) and the safeguarding of fundamental rights during a crisis, making specific reference to the situation at the Narva border. The analysis primarily focuses on oversight and administration, questioning whether the rights of individuals are being upheld. There are no references to specific data or technical terminology.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, addressing the minister directly and politely ("Honored Minister"). The tone is moderately critical, but rather conciliatory and invites self-reflection, as the speaker partially distances themselves from the widespread accusations. A logical appeal is employed, focusing on the assessment of the situation and future conduct.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Based on the available data, these are two questions that arose during the debate on the motion of no confidence. Data concerning a wider pattern of activity is unavailable.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker is in opposition to the actions of Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs Pakosta and is participating in the no-confidence proceedings. The criticism targets the Minister’s work management and her inability to resolve the border crisis, but it is being presented in a questioning manner rather than as an attack. The criticism focuses on political accountability and procedural shortcomings.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The presenter is drawing specific attention to the situation at the Narva border, highlighting the long queues there and the challenge of guaranteeing people's fundamental rights. The focus is on the issue of crisis management for that particular border area.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Regarding social matters, strong emphasis is placed on guaranteeing and protecting people's fundamental rights during border crossing situations. Particular attention is drawn to the plight of individuals waiting at the Narva border for a full day or longer, and the question is raised whether their rights are being protected.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on the minister's actions and operational issues (border management), not specific draft laws or proposed amendments.
2 Speeches Analyzed