By Plenary Sessions: Jüri Jaanson
Total Sessions: 38
Fully Profiled: 38
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
There is no direct political confrontation; the criticism is aimed at the discrepancy between the topic of the presentation and the chapter being discussed. The criticism is substantive and neutral, not personal.
2025-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Direct criticism is aimed at the Riigikogu's actions concerning the constant modification of the tax system, indicating dissatisfaction with the policies of the government or the majority due to a lack of stability. There are no personal attacks; the criticism is procedural and policy-based.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Direct criticism is aimed at the ruling by a Finnish court, which is deemed "more than strange" and potentially dangerous to Estonia's interests. The speech does not include criticism of domestic political opponents, but rather presents a demand for the government to create a strategy.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
There is no direct opposition; the criticism is aimed more at the potential for budget imbalance rather than the minister’s actual activities. The speaker references Urmas Reinsalu only to emphasize the minister’s role as a top-tier politician, not as an athlete.
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the Centre Party (Lauri Laats), specifically targeting their disparaging language used when addressing the government. The critique is intense, focusing on the opponent's rhetorical incompetence and their fundamental lack of substantive understanding of the issues.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
It does not directly criticize opponents or specific groups, but instead focuses on the deficiencies in the implementation of the system and policy. The criticism is aimed rather at the unsatisfactory pace of development in the area of accessibility.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The primary opposition is aimed at the EKRE faction, whose widespread absence is suspected to be an intentional delaying tactic, rather than members being in isolation for health reasons. The criticism is procedural and focuses on the inefficiency of the faction's actions in legislative work. The intensity of the attack is moderate, but it includes a direct questioning of their motives.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The objection is directed against the presiding officer and the Riigikogu's system for handling questions, criticizing procedural irregularity. The criticism is aimed at the fact that repeating a question at the request of the rapporteur is counted as a new question, which restricts the rights of the deputy.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The address contains no criticism or opposition whatsoever; it constitutes the formal and polite posing of a question to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Insufficient data.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed specifically at the bill initiated by the Isamaa faction, which concerns extending the requirement for an integrated permit to renewable energy projects. The criticism is rooted in policy and regulatory concerns, citing the Ministry of Climate's position that such regulation would actively undermine the goals of the green transition. Furthermore, he/she criticizes the measures chosen for a second bill—namely, establishing quotas for light personal mobility devices—as problematic.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
No data available
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The confrontation is directed at the speaker, whose views regarding anthropogenic climate change are being called into question. The criticism is intense and focuses on the opponent's assumptions about the necessity of the carbon quota system, directly asking if they deny scientific facts.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the inaction of the Estonian Medical Association and the doctors serving in Parliament, as they have failed to issue a strong protest concerning the allegedly serious health damage caused by wind turbines. The opposition specifically targets the lack of professional responsibility and ethics.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed at the actions of the Minister of Culture (or the government) concerning the merging of two important sectors into a single report, which limits the opportunities for Riigikogu members to submit questions. The opposition is both procedural and policy-based, emphasizing the inadequate attention given to the sports sector.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The direct adversary is not criticized, but a desire is expressed to resolve the ongoing disputes over gender definition, which indicates dissatisfaction with the current ambiguous situation. The criticism is directed at the administrative ambiguity of the system.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the Isamaa Party, whose opposition is considered inappropriate, as the issues they have highlighted should be resolved at the ministerial level, not through the draft legislation. The Social Democrats are being urged to vote in favor of the bill so that they might value the work of their own former minister, which suggests a slight degree of procedural pressure.
2025-03-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opposition is aimed at those who proposed closing the borders, questioning the substantive rationale behind the proposal, especially given the government's superior information. The criticism is rooted in policy and competence, stressing that the Government of the Republic is better qualified to make extreme decisions. It also indirectly criticizes the presenter/rapporteur regarding procedural matters.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the Isamaa party, which submitted the proposal for termination but failed to clarify what substantive changes they actually desired. The opposition is both procedural and policy-based, accusing their opponents of confusing the scope of the law and the regulation.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The confrontation is aimed at the government (the prime minister), critically questioning whether they possess a simple solution—a "magic wand"—for the long-term problem. The criticism is directed at the process of finding and analyzing solutions, not personal.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker does not express direct opposition but instead raises an informative question regarding the government's operational mechanism. Instead of criticism, clarification is sought concerning the work and added value of the economic cabinet.
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is not aimed at a specific political opponent, but rather at the procedure and prerequisites for establishing the investigative commission. Specifically, questions are being raised about whether the commission’s work already overlaps with the jurisdiction of law enforcement agencies, especially if the goal is to uncover misuse or malpractice.
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
Criticism is aimed at the activities of state bureaucracy and agencies (such as the Environmental Board) that hinder sports activities (the Pirita example). Furthermore, the need is stressed for the Minister of the Interior to analyze better integration of the work of the PPA and the Transport Agency in order to improve the chaos in water traffic and the safety of movement, citing the shortcomings of the current situation.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism targets the activities of Russia's shadow fleet and Chinese vessels, which pose a threat to Baltic Sea security. The speaker also calls into question the effectiveness of current international maritime law in guaranteeing security, pointing to Denmark's actions as a potential model.
2025-01-30
Fifteenth Estonian Parliament, fifth session, plenary session.
The objection is aimed at the position articulated by the presenter, which restricts participation in local elections solely to Estonian and EU citizens. The critique is policy-based and was presented in the form of a question, not as a sharp attack, but rather as a challenge to the stated position.
2025-01-29
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is insufficient data.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Direct criticism is aimed at colleague Reinsalu over the violation of procedural rules, deeming the submission of multiple questions within one minute inappropriate. No substantive opposition is expressed, but the concerns of companies regarding the bill’s potential constitutional infringement and economic impact are acknowledged, leaving these topics as subjects for further discussion.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is no direct opposition or criticism directed towards specific individuals or groups. The speaker is seeking information regarding the strategic decisions made by the leaders of the Defence Forces and the government, as well as the discussions held by the National Defence Committee.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Direct political opponents are not criticized. The speaker refers to general claims that cast doubt on the anthropogenic nature of climate change, but does not direct criticism toward specific political actors.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The criticism is aimed chiefly at the presiding officer's inaction and the practice of other deputies asking the rapporteur questions concerning their personal views. The objection is strictly procedural and focuses on the violation of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-10-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The main criticism is aimed at the representative of the Legal Affairs Committee, who is accused of presenting the matter unilaterally and taking a side. Furthermore, the speaker challenges the Ministry of Justice’s proposal to reject the draft legislation, stressing that the principle of legal certainty is not absolute. The criticism is directed at procedural and political choices, not at individuals.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The criticism is aimed at the Social Affairs Committee, questioning whether they have acknowledged the negative repercussions of the draft legislation on businesses and child safety. The critique is policy-driven, centering on the legislation's flawed risk assessment and the creation of an untenable situation for the heads of these institutions.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
There is no direct opposition or personal criticism, but the speaker raises doubts about the feasibility of the government's plans and their logistical preparedness. The criticism targets procedural deficiencies in the policy's implementation, specifically concerning citizen notification and the readiness of waste management operators.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Not enough data