Session Profile: Jüri Jaanson
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
2025-09-16
Political Position
A strong focus on social inclusion and the reduction of marginalization, which is addressed through the development of accessibility. The political stance is policy-based, emphasizing the need to improve the state of accessibility concerning public services and housing, notwithstanding previously adopted legislation. The position is moderately critical regarding the speed and effectiveness of implementation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates expertise in accessibility topics, distinguishing between issues concerning the accessibility of public services and those related to apartment buildings. The expertise relies on the Chancellor of Justice's review, which is referenced when identifying specific problem areas. Specific developments and a comparison with previous periods are requested, indicating a detailed interest in the subject.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is formal, respectful, and analytical, addressing the Vice-Chairman of the Riigikogu and the Chancellor of Justice. The discourse is logical and focuses on requesting specific data and clarifications regarding the development and problem areas of accessibility. Emotional appeals or personal attacks are not employed.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The records indicate participation in the Riigikogu plenary session debate concerning the Chancellor of Justice's overview, during which a specific and substantive question is raised. This pattern points to active involvement in oversight and accountability processes.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
It does not directly criticize opponents or specific groups, but instead focuses on the deficiencies in the implementation of the system and policy. The criticism is aimed rather at the unsatisfactory pace of development in the area of accessibility.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The collaborative style is institutional and respectful, addressing the Chancellor of Justice for clarification based on his review. The Riigikogu's previous legislative work in improving accessibility is acknowledged, referring to a collective effort.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national and general social infrastructure issues, such as public services and the accessibility of apartment buildings. There are no specific regional priorities.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
At the forefront of social issues is the exclusion caused by a lack of accessibility, which is recognized as a major social problem. The emphasis is placed on improving access both to public services and to the living environment.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on evaluating the effectiveness of previous legislation (laws adopted by the Riigikogu) in the field of accessibility. The priority is monitoring the implementation of these laws to see whether they have improved the situation, and to identify any remaining problem areas.
1 Speeches Analyzed