Session Profile: Jüri Jaanson
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
2024-10-10
Political Position
The political focus is on highlighting the conflict between the child protection law and the equal treatment act. The speaker is moderately critical of the draft bill, which puts businesses in an awkward position by forcing them to hire potentially dangerous individuals. Emphasis is placed on solving practical implementation issues and avoiding the law's unintended consequences.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the fields of child protection, the duty of care, and legislative procedure. They employ specific terms like the "Equal Treatment Act," "persons with spent convictions," and the "notification system," referencing detailed legal dilemmas. Furthermore, they are up-to-date on the discussions held within the Social Affairs Committee.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is formal and interrogative, respectfully addressing the session chairman and the rapporteur. The tone is concerned and analytical, focusing on logical arguments and the unexpected consequences of the draft bill. The figurative expression "a state of being put in a bind" is used to emphasize the unpleasant dilemma facing entrepreneurs.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Demonstrates activity during the plenary session by submitting questions and participating in the discussion regarding the handling of the draft bill. This pattern of activity indicates a desire to intervene in the critical phase of the legislative process, emphasizing that it is still possible to submit amendments. Data regarding other patterns of activity is unavailable.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is aimed at the Social Affairs Committee, questioning whether they have acknowledged the negative repercussions of the draft legislation on businesses and child safety. The critique is policy-driven, centering on the legislation's flawed risk assessment and the creation of an untenable situation for the heads of these institutions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The collaborative approach focuses on dialogue with the rapporteur, seeking clarification regarding the content of the information system and potential methods for improvement. The speaker initiates a discussion about the possibility of amending the draft legislation, indicating a willingness to remain open to making changes during the process. There is no direct mention of cross-party cooperation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic perspective focuses on the impact of the regulation on entrepreneurs and institutional leaders, emphasizing that the draft bill creates an unfavorable situation for them. This points to concerns regarding the obligations associated with regulating the business environment and hiring practices.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The primary social theme is child safety and protection, especially concerning the hiring of potentially dangerous individuals (those with pedophilic tendencies). The duty of care in assisting a child in need is emphasized, but a conflict with the equal treatment law is brought forward, which could jeopardize children's safety.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently centered on the handling of the ongoing draft bill concerning child protection, the duty of care, and the reporting system. The speaker positions themselves as someone highlighting the bill's deficiencies and stressing that there is still an opportunity to submit further amendments to steer the legislative process.
2 Speeches Analyzed