Session Profile: Jüri Jaanson

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

2025-09-04

Political Position
The political position heavily focuses on the procedural integrity and transparency of the Riigikogu. The speaker is skeptical of political delay tactics, questioning the justification for the mass absence of the EKRE faction. They also demand clarity regarding the schedule for debating draft legislation, especially in the context of overnight sessions, emphasizing the efficiency of parliamentary procedure.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of parliamentary procedural rules and the internal organization of the Riigikogu Board. They are competent to inquire about the duration of the change of the session chair and the feasibility of appointing a new presenter. This expertise is clearly aimed at managing and ensuring the transparency of the legislative process.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal, direct, and inquisitive, focusing on logical and procedural arguments. The tone is analytical and slightly skeptical, particularly when addressing procedural delays or a lack of schedule transparency. Emotional appeals are not utilized; the emphasis is placed on demanding information.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active in plenary sessions, intervening in procedural debates and raising questions regarding the management of the session. Their pattern of activity demonstrates timely interventions aimed at seeking clarification or challenging procedural rulings. They are attentive to the comments made by fellow parliamentarians and the overall timing of the sessions.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary opposition is aimed at the EKRE faction, whose widespread absence is suspected to be an intentional delaying tactic, rather than members being in isolation for health reasons. The criticism is procedural and focuses on the inefficiency of the faction's actions in legislative work. The intensity of the attack is moderate, but it includes a direct questioning of their motives.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The working style is focused more on demanding answers and explanations from the leadership regarding the organization of parliamentary work. Direct cooperation or a readiness to compromise with other factions is not evident from the speeches, although reference is made to the remarks of other parliamentarians concerning the timing of bill discussions.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is centered on the process and timeline for processing draft legislation, rather than the substance of specific bills. The speaker prioritizes procedural justice and the transparent administration of the legislative calendar, requesting information regarding the scheduling of debates.

2 Speeches Analyzed