By Months: Jüri Jaanson

Total Months: 12

Fully Profiled: 12

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
10.2025

6 Speeches

The collaborative style is constructive and supportive, praising the Minister of Finance's work on the budget, and subsequently raising a balanced question about sustainability. The speaker aims to strike a balance between necessary expenditures and cultural support.
Details View Details
09.2025

6 Speeches

Not enough data
Details View Details
06.2025

14 Speeches

The style of cooperation is open to interest groups, actively seeking feedback from entrepreneurs (wind farm developers) and local governments (the mayor/head of the municipality). He/She collaborates with government agencies, supporting the Ministry of Climate's positions on regulatory issues. Furthermore, he/she mentions cross-factional cooperation (referencing the participation of a fellow faction member in a visit).
Details View Details
05.2025

2 Speeches

Data unavailable.
Details View Details
04.2025

5 Speeches

Not enough data
Details View Details
03.2025

11 Speeches

The speaker emphasized the support for the draft legislation from the coalition partners (the Reform Party, Estonia 200) and the consensus decisions reached within the committee. He pointed to the broad cooperation involved, which included various interest groups (the Central Union of Property Owners, borehole companies) and legal experts, all aimed at guaranteeing the quality of the bill. The Social Democrats are now urged to support the draft, given that it was originally initiated by a minister from their own party.
Details View Details
02.2025

7 Speeches

The speaker is cooperative, referencing positively the work of the Estonian Olympic Committee and the ongoing analysis regarding the financing of sports facilities being conducted under Heidy Purga’s leadership at the Ministry of Culture. He/She stresses the need for better integration between the general education system and extracurricular activities, as well as coordinating the work of the Transport Administration and the Police and Border Guard Board to ensure water safety. Inquiries were also made concerning discussions with Baltic Sea countries regarding maritime law.
Details View Details
01.2025

2 Speeches

The style of cooperation is respectful and formal, addressing both the Minister and the presenter with respect. The objective is to obtain accurate information and influence policy by posing questions, which signals a readiness to operate within procedural frameworks.
Details View Details
12.2024

7 Speeches

The style of cooperation is open and constructive; he/she emphasizes that decisions in the commission were adopted by consensus and welcomes further constructive discussion on the draft. He/She is prepared to agree with colleagues (e.g., Metsoja) on the necessity of the discussion, while simultaneously offering technical clarifications.
Details View Details
11.2024

6 Speeches

The speaker expresses interest in the fluidity of cooperation between the government and the Riigikogu committee during the preparation of the Draft Law on a Climate-Resilient Economy. He/She looks forward to the arrival of the government's draft bill, which indicates a desire to begin constructive work. Direct references to cross-party cooperation are absent.
Details View Details
10.2024

7 Speeches

The speaker is open to discussion and achieving clarity, posing clarifying questions to the presenters. He refers to the opinion of the Government of the Republic in order to find common principles (legal certainty versus exceptional circumstances). He emphasizes that he represents himself, not the faction, which points to a readiness to take an independent position.
Details View Details
09.2024

5 Speeches

The collaborative style is respectful and constructive, starting communications by thanking the presenter for the substantive presentation. The speaker is open to dialogue and delving into details, requesting that the officials elaborate on their ideas more clearly.
Details View Details
Back to Profiling