By Plenary Sessions: Züleyxa Izmailova

The rhetorical style is formal, direct, and analytical, presenting questions about specific facts and figures to the presenter ("Dear Mario!"). The tone is businesslike and focuses on logical appeals, demanding clarification regarding cost coverage and additional fees charged to consumers.

The rhetoric is formal, analytical, and heavily data-driven, utilizing statistics concerning gender inequality and the burden of care. Instead of emotional appeals, the approach relies on facts and research to present the government with a detailed and substantive question. The style is interrogative and demands concrete solutions from the Prime Minister.

The rhetorical style is critical and concerned, emphasizing the lack of stability and legal clarity. The tone is interrogative and demanding. Logical argumentation is employed, referencing the shift in promises and the public support for a logging moratorium. The style is formal, suitable for addressing a minister during a parliamentary information session.

The rhetorical style is highly emotional, urgent, and condemnatory, utilizing strong language (such as "appalling," "obscene and vile") to characterize the incident in question. The appeal is primarily moral, presenting direct and demanding questions to the minister concerning responsibility and systemic failure.