Agenda Profile: Züleyxa Izmailova
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden concerning the Execution of Kingdom of Sweden Prison Sentences in the Republic of Estonia (682 SE)
2025-11-04
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Political Position
The political position is strongly antagonistic toward the draft bill under consideration, emphasizing procedural deficiencies and the low level of public trust in politicians. The core issues highlighted are public safety, crime prevention, and a systematic approach to isolating dangerous individuals, pointing directly to the government's failure to ensure these measures. The overall stance is primarily outcome-oriented and values-driven, demanding that matters be handled correctly and justly.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the procedural requirements for legislation, stressing that the draft bill failed to meet the necessary criteria for reaching this chamber. Knowledge is also demonstrated in the field of internal security and criminal policy, referencing the underutilization of Tartu prison, the rise in violent incidents, and the lack of patrols on the streets.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical, deeply concerned, and demanding, especially when addressing the minister, insisting on "hand on heart" assurances regarding the safety of the Estonian people. Both logical arguments (procedural errors, lack of resources) and emotional appeals are utilized, stressing how the public's trust has been worn thin and that lives are being put at risk.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The data indicates active participation in the Riigikogu session during the first reading of the draft bill, evidenced by the submission of consecutive questions and procedural remarks. The speaker identifies themselves as a Member of Parliament with less experience, but remains persistent in the debate nonetheless.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Strong opposition is directed at the Reform Party, which is being criticized for its long tenure in government, a period that has led to insufficient funding for the isolation of dangerous individuals. Criticism is also aimed at the government's actions during the preparation of the draft bill, with demands that they take a step back and put things in order.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker points to other, more experienced MPs who have similarly highlighted procedural deficiencies, suggesting collaboration with other critics. There is no evidence of a willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party cooperation with the government; rather, they are demanding that the errors be corrected.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on the national level (Estonian security, the situation at Tartu Prison) and the international level (the arrival of Swedish prisoners and the agreement with the Kingdom of Sweden). There is no emphasis on internal Estonian regional problems.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic views are linked to the state's inability to finance internal security and crime prevention. It is emphasized that the lack of funds necessary to isolate dangerous individuals is a direct consequence of the long-term governance led by the Reform Party.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The primary social issue is public safety and concern over the rise in violent incidents. Emphasis is placed on the need to isolate dangerous individuals from society and protect the life and health of the Estonian people from potential criminal elements and the relatives of inmates. Security is clearly the preferred topic.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently centered on opposing the draft bill (682 SE) concerning the ratification of the agreement on the enforcement of Swedish custodial sentences. The speaker is acting in opposition, specifically highlighting the bill's failure to satisfy procedural criteria and the subsequent security risks involved.
5 Speeches Analyzed