Session Profile: Annely Akkermann
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
2024-10-15
Political Position
The speaker strongly backs the government’s fiscal policy and the decision to postpone the tax reform, justifying this stance by citing the necessity of ensuring the sustainability of state finances. The delay in abolishing the tax hump is defended as a necessary measure to cover expenditures, even though it disproportionately impacts middle-income earners. The overall position is clearly pro-government and pragmatic.
13 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the field of the state budget and taxation, using precise figures and technical details. They mention specific sums (474 million euros for the impact of the tax bracket adjustment, 113 million for the VAT impact) and thoroughly explain the mechanisms governing transferable budget balances. They show a strong grasp of the work of the Finance Committee and the nuances of the legislative process.
13 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style of speech is formal and fact-based, concentrating on explaining technical details. It employs polite forms of address ("dear colleagues," "esteemed colleagues") and openly acknowledges the limits of their knowledge ("I cannot comment off the top of my head"). The style is more informative than persuasive, avoiding emotional arguments.
13 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively participates in the work of the Finance Committee, citing specific dates (October 1st, October 10th) and committee sessions. They mention regular meetings with ministers and the handling of next year's budget. This demonstrates systematic effort in managing the legislative process as a representative of the Finance Committee.
13 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Notes that Martin Helme and Aivar Kokk voted against the amendments to the Income Tax Act in the Finance Committee. At the same time, strong criticism is not expressed toward the opposition; instead, the focus is on providing factual answers to their questions. The attitude is rather neutral and professional than confrontational.
13 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Emphasizes consensus-based decisions in the Finance Committee and cooperation with various ministers. Mentions constructive discussions in the committee and the cooperation of ministers when submitting data. Demonstrates openness to answering questions and sharing additional information with colleagues.
13 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
It specifically mentions Ida-Virumaa in connection with the acquisition of radars and the development of wind farms. It also refers to the relocation of the National Archives to the National Library building. Overall, the focus tends to be on national rather than regional issues, but it demonstrates awareness regarding local impacts.
13 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Supports fiscal discipline and budget sustainability, defending the increase in the tax burden as a necessary measure. It shows an understanding of the long-term nature of investment projects and advocates for improving the budgetary position by clawing back unused funds. The stance is pragmatically conservative regarding financial matters.
13 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
13 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Focuses on budget and tax legislation, managing the proceedings for the 2024 state budget amendments and changes to the Income Tax Act. Emphasizes strict adherence to the legislative process, setting specific deadlines for proposed amendments. Demonstrates a systematic approach to handling legislation as a representative of the Finance Committee.
13 Speeches Analyzed