Agenda Profile: Annely Akkermann
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (113 SE)
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Political Position
The Speaker took a clear stance against the draft bill to amend the Income Tax Act, recommending that it be rejected. The position was firm and uncompromising, demonstrating strong opposition to the proposed changes.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaking style was polite and formal, utilizing traditional parliamentary addresses ("Dear colleagues," "Mr./Madam Speaker"). The wording was diplomatic, yet simultaneously decisive, avoiding a confrontational tone.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The Speaker actively participated in the work of the Finance Committee, referencing the committee's discussions and decision-making process. The activity focused on reviewing draft legislation and providing recommendations.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The Speaker emphasized collective decision-making, referencing the Finance Committee's joint deliberation and decision. The approach was institution-based, relying on the results of the committee's work.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The Speaker expressed criticism regarding the proposed amendments to the Income Tax Act, recommending the rejection of the bill. However, the specific economic positions remained unstated.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The Speaker focused on assessing the draft amendment to the Income Tax Act, acting in their capacity as the representative of the Finance Committee. The approach adopted was procedure-centric, adhering strictly to the standard procedural rules of the parliament.
2 Speeches Analyzed