Agenda Profile: Annely Akkermann
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 183 SE)
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Political Position
The Speaker adopted a clear stance against amending the Income Tax Act, supporting the Finance Committee's decision to reject the draft legislation. The opposition to lowering the income tax rate to 19.9% demonstrates a fiscally conservative approach.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates a strong grasp of taxation and the legislative process. Uses precise technical terminology, such as "the income tax rate payable on the income of a natural person and a non-resident," and exhibits thorough knowledge of committee procedure.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
An official and concise style, focusing on facts and procedural aspects. It employs direct and clear language, devoid of emotional or persuasive elements, strictly adhering to parliamentary etiquette.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Due to the insufficiency of data, it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding the patterns of activity.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Due to the lack of data, the oppositional stance cannot be evaluated.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
It shows cooperation with the Finance Committee, citing the committee's decision and putting forth a collective proposal. It demonstrates an institutional approach to legislation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Due to insufficient data, the regional focus cannot be assessed.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
It supports maintaining the current income tax rate while opposing tax reductions. This points to a fiscally conservative stance that prioritizes the stability of the state's revenue base.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Due to the limited amount of data, it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding social issues.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Focuses on the field of taxation, specifically on issues related to the Income Tax Act. Functions more as an opponent of the draft bill than as its initiator, supporting the Finance Committee's stance on rejecting the bill.
1 Speeches Analyzed