Agenda Profile: Annely Akkermann
Draft law amending the Value Added Tax Act (596 SE) – First Reading
2025-05-22
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Political Position
The speaker takes a clear stance against lowering the VAT, strongly arguing that a 2% reduction in VAT would not be passed on to consumer prices but would instead be absorbed into corporate profits. He/She supports the current tax system, emphasizing that the 654-euro tax-free minimum already provides support for low-wage earners. This position is firm and well-reasoned, based on both theoretical arguments and practical experience as an entrepreneur.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the fields of tax policy, business, and economics. He utilizes specific figures (260 million euros, 654 euros tax-free allowance, 20% income tax), references comparative data from Latvia, and analyzes the intricacies of the corporate income tax system. By mentioning his entrepreneurial experience dating back to 1991, he showcases a practical understanding of market and financial management.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaking style is analytical and fact-based, utilizing specific figures and comparisons to back up the arguments. They employ humor and personal anecdotes (referencing Kaia Iva’s mathematician example) to illustrate the dangers inherent in drawing misleading conclusions. The style is straightforward and persuasive, yet not aggressive; rather, it is explanatory and instructive.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively participated in the work of the Finance Committee, citing the April 8 session and procedural decisions. They mentioned regular communication with the Ministry of Finance and receiving monthly public finance overviews as committee members. This pattern of activity demonstrates systematic and consistent involvement in the committee's work.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker criticizes the supporters of the draft legislation, particularly Rain Epler, but approaches the critique in a well-reasoned and substantive manner. He challenges the claims that lowering the VAT would benefit low-income earners, backing his arguments with mathematical evidence and comparative data. The criticism is based on principle and policy, not personal attacks.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate, referencing the commission's consensus decisions and respecting colleagues' viewpoints ("you are completely right in that sense"). They acknowledge the arguments of others but remain committed to their own position. The style is diplomatic, yet firm in their convictions.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker supports the current tax system and is skeptical about tax cuts, especially if they fail to deliver the anticipated results. He argues that Estonia's corporate income tax system is generous and supports the capitalization of businesses. Their economic views are pragmatic, emphasizing market mechanisms and the role of competition in price formation.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker emphasizes supporting low-wage earners through the tax system, claiming that the 654-euro tax-exempt minimum is already sufficient support. He analyzes the thresholds for livelihood support and their connection to VAT, demonstrating knowledge of the social protection system.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker focuses on the analysis and subsequent rejection of the draft bill to amend the Value-Added Tax Act. He/She represents the position of the Finance Committee and clarifies the procedural decisions. The approach taken is systematic, concentrating specifically on the economic impacts of the bill and the absence of viable alternatives.
9 Speeches Analyzed