Agenda Profile: Annely Akkermann
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – Second Reading
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
Political Position
The speaker strongly supports budgetary discipline and adherence to proper procedural rules. He sharply criticizes the Isamaa faction's amendments, calling them technically non-conforming and unprofessional. He highlights the positive impact of the government's 69 million euro cut and expects the opposition to acknowledge this achievement.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The text demonstrates profound expertise regarding the legal foundations of the state budget, accurately referencing the Basic State Budget Law, the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act, and relevant procedural regulations. It employs technical terminology like structural budget deficit, financing transactions, and sector-specific programs. It operates with precise figures and dates, showcasing comprehensive knowledge of the budgetary process.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker uses a formal, technocratic style, which is more didactic than emotional. They rely on facts and legislation but also include ironic remarks ("the basic budget law is, of course, your bible"). The tone is authoritative and occasionally paternalistic, particularly toward the opposition. Lengthy explanations are avoided, considering the late hour.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
This points to an intensive work schedule, noting that the Finance Committee met three times (November 4, 7, and 11) specifically to discuss the draft legislation. It details precise deadlines and procedural steps, indicating a systematic and thorough approach. Furthermore, it stresses the necessity of swift handling to ensure the amendments enter into force before the close of 2024.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Directly criticizes the Isamaa faction, and Helir-Valdor Seeder in particular, accusing them of submitting technically flawed amendments and twisting words. [The speaker/source] argues that the opposition is not following proper procedural rules and is submitting unprofessional proposals. Nevertheless, [the speaker/source] simultaneously expects the opposition to acknowledge the government's budget cut decisions.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Highlights the consensus-based work and quality standards of the Finance Committee. Notes the cooperation with ministries in preparing amendments. Demonstrates a willingness to clarify technical details and answer questions, while still maintaining an authoritative position. Supports the committee's shared policy of only submitting properly formulated amendments to the floor.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Strongly supports fiscal discipline and budget cuts. It considers the 69 million euro cost reduction a significant achievement and emphasizes that these funds will not be carried over to the next year. It strictly adheres to legal limitations when modifying the total budget volume and in order to avoid a structural deficit.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on the technical processing of the State Budget Amendment Act and ensuring compliance with legal requirements. It emphasizes the quality of the proposed amendments and their adherence to statutory requirements. It supports the swift processing of the draft bill, setting November 20 as the deadline for submitting amendments. Furthermore, it ensures that all procedural steps are legally sound.
4 Speeches Analyzed