Agenda Profile: Annely Akkermann
Third Reading of the Draft Law on the State Supplementary Budget for 2024 (Bill 456 SE)
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
Political Position
The speaker strongly supports the country's fiscal discipline and adherence to European Union budget rules, defending the 2024 supplementary budget, which reduces the general government deficit below 3% of GDP. He took a clear stance in favor of abolishing the 'tax hump,' justifying this as a reduction in labor taxes and a measure to support competitiveness. He also defended the Reform Party's decisions regarding national defense, emphasizing that defense spending rose above 3% of GDP during Kaja Kallas's government.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates profound knowledge of the budget process, tax policy, and legal requirements. Uses precise figures and statistics (183 million euros for measures, 115 million in savings), detailing the impact of the tax curve on various income groups using concrete examples. Shows excellent command of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure Act and the State Budget Act, justifying the rejection of proposed amendments due to non-compliance with legal requirements.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
Employs a factual and technically precise style, relying on concrete figures and legal arguments. Uses practical examples (e.g., a caregiver's salary of 1200 euros) to clarify complex tax issues. Maintains a formal tone, but also permits personal commentary (regarding working hours) and provides direct responses to criticism. Balances technical explanations with political viewpoints.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
This refers to an intense work schedule, mentioning shutting down the computer at 9:30 PM and having the first meeting at 7:30 AM. They actively participate in the work of the Finance Committee and the preparation of the budget. This demonstrates continuous engagement with budgetary matters, noting that the supplementary budget has been "negotiated for months."
10 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
He/She directly criticizes the Isamaa faction’s proposed amendments, labeling them "doubly populist" and legally flawed. He/She dismisses Reinsalu’s accusations, noting that the 2023 budget was passed down by the predecessor and had received support from all parliamentary groups. He/She maintains a professional approach, choosing to focus on highlighting technical shortcomings rather than engaging in personal attacks.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
It emphasizes the consensus decisions of the Finance Committee and their collective work in preparing the budget. It recognizes the civil service for submitting accurate budget data. It shows a willingness to explain and educate, answering questions in detail and with patience. It uses the "we" form, emphasizing teamwork within the government.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Strongly supports fiscal discipline and responsible budgetary policy, emphasizing the necessity of complying with EU budget rules. It advocates for the abolition of the tax hump as a means of lowering labor taxes and boosting competitiveness. It recognizes that Estonia is transitioning into a high labor cost country and requires adjustments to its tax system. It considers flexibility in the tax system to be normal, noting that "taxes are not carved in stone" and must adapt to the needs of society.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There isn't enough data.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Focuses on budget legislation and tax policy, overseeing the processing of the 2024 supplementary budget. Emphasizes the importance of adhering to legal requirements in legislation, rejecting formally deficient amendment proposals. Supports amendments to the Income Tax Act (a €700 tax-free minimum, 22% income tax), which will enter into force at the beginning of 2025.
10 Speeches Analyzed