By Months: Diana Ingerainen

The rhetorical style is highly formal, neutral, and fact-based, typical of a presentation given by a commission representative. The speaker uses clear and concise language to communicate the commission’s decisions, the procedural timeline, and the participants involved. Emotional or personal appeals are entirely absent.

The discourse is largely formal, procedural, and analytical, focusing on the reporting of facts and Commission decisions. The tone is neutral and cautious, employing logical arguments and technical terminology (e.g., "consensus decisions," "employment," "taxation"). He/She repeatedly emphasizes data gaps ("we do not know exactly") and the need for an impact analysis.

The style is formal and deliberate, particularly in committee reports, where repeated reference is made to colleagues and the presiding officer. On national defense topics, the tone is urgent and emphasizes the need for flexibility and decisiveness when responding to threats. Regarding healthcare issues, he/she employs both praise and criticism concerning the unwarranted expansion of the subject matter, balancing logical argumentation with the mention of ethical considerations.

The style is formal, procedural, and analytical, focusing on the neutral presentation of the Finance Committee's discussions and decisions. The speaker relies on logical arguments and expert viewpoints, avoiding emotional appeals. They maintain a polite tone towards the questioners, repeatedly using the address, "Thank you, dear questioner!"

The style of address is extremely formal, serious, and dutiful, suitable for an official oath-taking ceremony. The message is direct and procedural, focusing on the assumption of the role of a Riigikogu member.