By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Hussar

The political stance heavily focuses on security concerns and foreign influence, criticizing the attempts by the Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (MPEÕK) to justify Patriarch Kirill's actions by claiming he acts as a private individual. The speaker views this position as a clever deception, emphasizing Kirill's actual role in legitimizing Russia's aggression and crimes in Ukraine. This position is value-based and strongly opposes the tenets of "Russkiy Mir."

The political position focuses on fiscal transparency and the issues surrounding banking taxation. A skeptical stance is adopted, demanding concrete numerical comparisons of the tax burden on banking in Estonia and Lithuania in order to evaluate the validity of the political claims. This position is strongly policy- and results-driven, centering on state budget revenues.

The political position expresses strong support for Estonia's strategic foreign policy, which is regarded as successful and recognized by our allies. The primary emphasis is placed on increasing the role of parliamentary diplomacy, particularly in connection with the full-scale war in Ukraine. The speaker highlights the strategic and results-oriented framework of the policy.