By Agendas: Lauri Hussar

The speaker demonstrates thorough knowledge of the Law on the Election of the President of the Republic, the history of constitutional amendments (18 failed attempts), and the complexity of the Electoral College proportions following the administrative reform. He/She uses technical terminology (e.g., the Population Register, § 22 subsection 1) and refers to previous elections (2016, 2021) to illustrate the problems. The presentation is authoritative and relies on facts and historical context.

The speaker demonstrates authority in managing the agenda and procedural order of the Riigikogu session by introducing the eighth agenda item. However, there is no evidence of substantive knowledge regarding planning law or industrial policy.

Insufficient information. The speaker fails to present data, technical terminology, or a substantive explanation regarding Draft Act 701 amending the Chemicals Act, focusing solely on procedural management.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the procedural rules of the Riigikogu and the management of its sessions. Specifically, the discussion addresses the obligation of ministers to respond and the role of the session chair in compelling those answers. There is no information concerning the use of substantive policy (economic, social) or technical terminology.

The speaker demonstrates high expertise in the internal organization of the Riigikogu, the planning of session agendas, and procedural matters, referencing the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act and its commentaries ("the yellow book"). He/She is detailed regarding issues concerning the Riigikogu Member Status Act, knowing precisely the current 30% limit for expense allowances and the financial impact of the proposed cut (one-sixth), which amounts to 400,000 euros annually. Furthermore, he/she addresses logistical issues concerning the Riigikogu chamber (furniture work).

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the fields of legislation and security, employing specific terminology such as "infringement of fundamental rights," "modern information society," and "specific provisions." This expertise focuses on legislative details and legal frameworks which must guarantee the protection of fundamental rights when technological solutions are utilized.

Insufficient data.

The speaker demonstrates familiarity with canonical law and ecclesiastical terminology, employing these arguments to refute MPEOK's claims that the roles of the patriarch are separable. Emphasis is placed on the patriarch's role as "father of the people" and "father of the church" in the biblical and ecclesiastical context.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the details regarding the taxation of Estonian banking, referencing specific tax types (advance income tax, extraordinary dividend tax) and budget figures (250–260 million). This expertise is evident in the demand for detailed comparative financial data concerning Lithuania, needed to assess the differences in the tax burden.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of foreign policy, using terms like "parliamentary diplomacy" and "strategic perspective." This expertise is supported by external authority, specifically by referencing an allied nation's ambassador's positive assessment of Estonia's foreign policy. The enormous growth in the importance of parliamentary diplomacy is emphasized.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of parliamentary history and procedures, referencing old transcripts and specific past events (e.g., the events of 2015 and 2016). Separately, the issue of excise policy dating back to 2014 is highlighted, although it is presented via a humorous quote. The expertise displayed is rather observational and retrospective.

The speaker demonstrates authority regarding the Riigikogu’s internal financial matters and legislative procedures. They present specific data on the impact of the cut (a reduction by one-sixth, saving nearly 400,000 euros annually). It is emphasized that the proposed cut has been implemented in a manner that does not restrict the Riigikogu’s capacity to execute its constitutional duties.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the technical and legal aspects of legislation, specifically referencing Section 75 of the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia and the requirements concerning the law's effective date. Furthermore, he/she displays knowledge regarding the statistics on Riigikogu members' fulfillment of their duties and attendance at committee sessions.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the legislation governing the status of Riigikogu members and constitutional restrictions, knowing that while salaries cannot be altered, expenses can be cut. Specific financial data (a saving of 400,000 euros) and budgetary terminology, such as improving the structural balance of the state budget, are utilized.

No data available

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the financial details of foreign policy and international aid, specifically mentioning the US Congress's $61 billion aid package. They are also well-versed in the high-level diplomatic efforts undertaken by the Baltic states and Estonia in Washington.