Session Profile: Martin Helme
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
2024-04-15
Political Position
The political position is firmly focused on scrutinizing the actions of the government and the governing bodies of the Riigikogu (Parliament), and ensuring their accountability. The speaker highlights violations of the constitution and the rules of procedure, specifically regarding the failure to meet the deadline for responding to an interpellation, which suggests the criticism is performance-based. Furthermore, there is criticism directed at the inefficient use of public funds in road construction, prioritizing large infrastructure projects over smaller expenditures.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the Estonian Parliament's procedural norms, specifically referencing the 20-day deadline for responding to an interpellation. Furthermore, they possess knowledge of road construction specifics, citing the approximate unit price of plastic posts (80 euros) and their installation density.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is critical, procedural, and demanding, employing direct questions to pinpoint responsibility ('who is actually to blame?'). The speaker combines legal arguments (constitutional violation) with practical, economic analysis (the cost of poles versus four-lane roads).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active during the plenary session, posing oral questions regarding both violations of procedural order and the expediency of state investments. His/Her pattern of activity involves holding the government and the Riigikogu Board accountable.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition’s stance is directed against both the executive branch (the minister) and the governing bodies of the Riigikogu (the board/presidium). The criticism is primarily procedural, accusing them of violating the constitution and the rules of procedure due to their failure to respond to an interpellation. Additionally, the inefficiency of government expenditures is also being criticized.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Lack of data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national issues, covering questions regarding the Riigikogu’s rules of procedure and constitutionality, as well as extensive national road construction. Specific regional projects or communities are not emphasized.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker supports the prudent and effective use of public funds and fiscal discipline. He criticizes the installation of expensive plastic posts, preferring instead to invest in larger, longer-term infrastructure projects, such as four-lane roads.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Lack of data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is directed toward monitoring compliance with existing legislation and procedural norms, particularly concerning the deadlines for responding to inquiries. The speaker is primarily acting as an overseer, demanding strict adherence to current laws.
1 Speeches Analyzed