Session Profile: Martin Helme
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
2024-03-18
Political Position
The speaker takes a strong, oppositional stance concerning matters within the purview of the Ministry of Justice, specifically targeting the Prosecutor's Office's alleged unlawful activities and lack of accountability. This position is distinctly results-based, stressing the need to guarantee fair and impartial functioning and the deployment of internal control mechanisms. Special attention is drawn to concerns over unauthorized surveillance (wiretapping) and the failure to achieve the goals of the anti-corruption legislation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates a thorough knowledge of the functioning of the legal system, repeatedly citing court assessments regarding the legality of the prosecutor's office proceedings. The professional focus centers on the rules of criminal procedure, illegal surveillance activities, the collection of evidence, and the lack of mechanisms for disciplining prosecutors. Technical terms such as "surveillance activities" and "procedural rules" are used.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is sharp, critical, and interrogative, leveling direct challenges against the integrity and impartiality of the leaders of the justice system. The speaker relies on logical arguments and cites previous court rulings to highlight violations of procedural rules. The tone is accusatory and demands accountability, rather than being conciliatory.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Data is scarce.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary targets of criticism are the Prosecutor’s Office and the Prosecutor General, who stand accused of violating the law, engaging in illegal surveillance activities, and failing to implement disciplinary mechanisms. The criticism is intense and focuses on both procedural and ethical violations, highlighting examples such as the alleged wiretapping of the Minister of Justice. Opposition is also directed at the Ministry of Justice for its inability to exercise proper oversight.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Data is scarce.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is exclusively on national institutions and the legality of their activities (the Prosecutor's Office, the Ministry of Justice, and the courts). There are no references to regional or local issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Data is scarce
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
In the realm of social issues, emphasis is placed on the reliability and legality of the justice system, particularly concerning illegal surveillance activities and the collection of evidence. This touches upon the balance between civil liberties and state power, demanding greater assurance regarding the ethical conduct of state institutions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the implementation of the anti-corruption law and the achievement of its objectives. Furthermore, attention is being directed toward deficiencies in the legal system's internal control and disciplinary mechanisms, demanding measures to hold prosecutors who violate the law accountable.
2 Speeches Analyzed